Stimuli
Camera
Life:
I find
the idea of Camera Life quite fascinating; life’s experiences are condensed and
flashes of life and memories laid bare. Cameras are able to capture emotions
and can reveal more than the subject is aware of. In addition, one of the luxuries of a camera
is the ability to change or manipulate an image through the use of different
angles and settings. Within a solo this can be portrayed through repetition
- the same movement repeated with
different heights and angles, portraying different viewpoints and perspectives.
Cog Brain:
The piece is making it clear that all the parts in the brain
are interdependent; if something is damaged it will cause a chain
reaction. This idea reveals the delicacy
and complexity of the human brain. The
mechanical and robotic image of the brain suggests this being lacks emotion -
it has been dehumanised. Everything is drawn with such detail in the picture
which gives me the idea that all the movements in a solo would be small and
precise, with plenty of embellishment.
Data:
Of all
the stimuli, data is the hardest for me to interpret. However, the straight
lines initially suggest there is a lack of fluidity, which could be portrayed
with sharp, dynamic movements. There is also a great deal of symmetry present
in the picture, which could be reflected in body alignment and repetition. Nevertheless, of interest to me is the way
that the data also looks like a constellation of stars, showing how man-made
data reflects the beauty, mystery and power of universal laws. The initial sharp movements could therefore
develop with more flowing energy and power.
Human:
I have
noticed the great structure within this picture, and the growth from the small
to the large: from the left-hand pattern
which looks like the tiniest DNA strand, to the exploding interconnections
flowing from the human being. This
allows for great contrast - the growth of movements from small to large, sharp
and crisp movements developing into ones which are smoother and wider. However, like Cog Head I feel everything is interdependent encouraging
a fluid link between movements.
Pollution:
The
overall mood from the picture is deathly, dirty and dark. Extreme dynamic
movement will be needed to portray pollution, as well as resistance to
demonstrate the thick and heavy air and toxic products produced. Height can be
used as a way of demonstrating gradual death, slowly progressing with less
movement focused on the floor.
Human
(painting):
I gather
this person is not whole - neither spiritually, physically nor mentally. The eyes, nose and skull are missing and the
bowed posture suggests that he is suffering sadness and resignation. Experiences have flooded out of him and the
smudged paint where the eyes might have been suggests an inability to see life
and purpose. A dance with contrasting
speed of movement and tempos would reflect inner torment and hollowness.
Gun
Child:
Violence,
confusion and the loss of innocence are the messages screaming from this
picture. In its attempt to convey the atrocities of war and to shock the viewer
- a young innocent-looking girl is holding
a destructive weapon. This challenges
the usual stereotype by switching both gender and age. This juxtaposition is
alarming and fear provoking which would be the overriding theme in a solo. The
direct eye contact is intimidating and could be used to great effect on the
audience.
Landscape:
This
image portrays a jaded, ugly and battered scene. Unlike a typical ‘landscape’
of nature, this is totally man-made and the two characters in the foreground –
one of whom is a child – appear to be victims of the ugliness. The wires look aggressive, wild and out of
control. They have a connection, but the loose wires suggest a loss of
communication in today’s world, with some looking like toppled crucifixes. The scene looks apocalyptic, especially with
the people standing small and vulnerable. A dance employing discordant
movements, with the human form being distorted by external forces would express
this vulnerability.
You have communicated all of these in great detail. Why was the data stimuli the hardest one for you to interpret. Was it the vast amount of lines? Or possibly the idea that they was all attached? In addition to this what movements would you put in your choreography to portray the Sharp lines ?
ReplyDeleteI believe the data stimuli was the hardest one for me to interpret because I felt I didn't know how to develop it beyond lines and connections. Although I had the idea of the star constellations, it was unclear to me where that interpretation would lead to. I felt it was easier for me to develop ideas and read into the meanings of the other stimuli because they were more typical, day to day images.
DeleteHowever, if I were to develop the Data stimuli, it might have mystical connotations. The sharp lines would demonstrate the unpredictable and the spontaneous nature of stars-ready to ignite into a shooting star at any moment. I would project these movements with sudden arm swings, unexpected long lined jumps and asymmetrical movements and positions.
It is clear that you have deeply analysed each stimulus and you have very clearly presented these ideas in your blog post.
ReplyDeleteWhat one were you most drawn to, which one do you think you will get the most inspiration for your choreography from?
I feel I am mostly drawn to the Cog Head and the Landscapes stimuli. I feel they both have a haunting and wistful undercurrent and can be interpreted in many different ways. I have considered many different possibilities about why and how the people in the pictures are in their positions. I enjoying looking at the scenarios like this because I am able to construct and design what their story will be. I feel particularly drawn to these two stimuli because I want to experiment with more expressive and powerful subjects that can touch others emotionally.
DeleteDid the use of group discussion have an impact on your thoughts? What other ideas and interpretations were discussed during the lesson? Reflecting back, which stimuli were you most drawn to at this moment and why? What drew you away from the other options?
ReplyDeleteI definitely feel the combined group discussion provoked many of my best ideas! It was very interesting to hear everyone’s different interpretations of each stimulus. I also felt that the paired discussions and mind maps helped greatly, when one had an idea another thought was prompted - like a chain reaction. At the end of the class, I had clearly sectioned the stimuli I was most drawn to and the ones that I lacked a connection to. I feel that the ones I connected to the most were the ones in which I had some personal experience: for example Cog Head, representing dementia, and Landscape, suggesting world issues. However, I was drawn away from some because I felt unable to develop them fully. For example I felt I couldn't really find a narrative for the Human 2. Although I could see the patterns within the picture, it did not prompt any meaningful experience I could relate to.
Delete